- Journal Home
- Volume 36 - 2024
- Volume 35 - 2024
- Volume 34 - 2023
- Volume 33 - 2023
- Volume 32 - 2022
- Volume 31 - 2022
- Volume 30 - 2021
- Volume 29 - 2021
- Volume 28 - 2020
- Volume 27 - 2020
- Volume 26 - 2019
- Volume 25 - 2019
- Volume 24 - 2018
- Volume 23 - 2018
- Volume 22 - 2017
- Volume 21 - 2017
- Volume 20 - 2016
- Volume 19 - 2016
- Volume 18 - 2015
- Volume 17 - 2015
- Volume 16 - 2014
- Volume 15 - 2014
- Volume 14 - 2013
- Volume 13 - 2013
- Volume 12 - 2012
- Volume 11 - 2012
- Volume 10 - 2011
- Volume 9 - 2011
- Volume 8 - 2010
- Volume 7 - 2010
- Volume 6 - 2009
- Volume 5 - 2009
- Volume 4 - 2008
- Volume 3 - 2008
- Volume 2 - 2007
- Volume 1 - 2006
Commun. Comput. Phys., 29 (2021), pp. 1213-1245.
Published online: 2021-02
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
The presented work is dedicated to the mathematical and numerical modeling of unsteady single- and two-phase flows using finite volume and penalty methods. Two classes of Navier-Stokes solvers are considered. Their accuracy and robustness are compared to identify their respective strengths and weaknesses. Exact (also referred to as monolythic) solvers such as the Augmented Lagrangian and the Fully Coupled methods address the saddle-point structure on the pressure-velocity couple of the discretized system by means of a penalization term or even directly, whereas approximate (segregated) solvers such as the Standard Projection method rely on operator splitting to break the problem down to decoupled systems. The objective is to compare all approaches in the context of two-phase flows at high viscosity and density ratios. To characterize the interface location, a volume-of-fluid (VOF) approach is used based on a Piecewise Linear Interface Construction (PLIC). Various 2D simulations are performed on single- and two-phase flows to characterize the behavior and performances of the various solvers.
}, issn = {1991-7120}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.OA-2020-0044}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/cicp/18648.html} }The presented work is dedicated to the mathematical and numerical modeling of unsteady single- and two-phase flows using finite volume and penalty methods. Two classes of Navier-Stokes solvers are considered. Their accuracy and robustness are compared to identify their respective strengths and weaknesses. Exact (also referred to as monolythic) solvers such as the Augmented Lagrangian and the Fully Coupled methods address the saddle-point structure on the pressure-velocity couple of the discretized system by means of a penalization term or even directly, whereas approximate (segregated) solvers such as the Standard Projection method rely on operator splitting to break the problem down to decoupled systems. The objective is to compare all approaches in the context of two-phase flows at high viscosity and density ratios. To characterize the interface location, a volume-of-fluid (VOF) approach is used based on a Piecewise Linear Interface Construction (PLIC). Various 2D simulations are performed on single- and two-phase flows to characterize the behavior and performances of the various solvers.