- Journal Home
- Volume 36 - 2024
- Volume 35 - 2024
- Volume 34 - 2023
- Volume 33 - 2023
- Volume 32 - 2022
- Volume 31 - 2022
- Volume 30 - 2021
- Volume 29 - 2021
- Volume 28 - 2020
- Volume 27 - 2020
- Volume 26 - 2019
- Volume 25 - 2019
- Volume 24 - 2018
- Volume 23 - 2018
- Volume 22 - 2017
- Volume 21 - 2017
- Volume 20 - 2016
- Volume 19 - 2016
- Volume 18 - 2015
- Volume 17 - 2015
- Volume 16 - 2014
- Volume 15 - 2014
- Volume 14 - 2013
- Volume 13 - 2013
- Volume 12 - 2012
- Volume 11 - 2012
- Volume 10 - 2011
- Volume 9 - 2011
- Volume 8 - 2010
- Volume 7 - 2010
- Volume 6 - 2009
- Volume 5 - 2009
- Volume 4 - 2008
- Volume 3 - 2008
- Volume 2 - 2007
- Volume 1 - 2006
Commun. Comput. Phys., 28 (2020), pp. 459-476.
Published online: 2020-05
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
Removing internal multiples remains an important but challenging problem
in seismic processing. The generalized Estimation of Primaries by Sparsity Inversion
(EPSI) method minimizes data residuals between the calculated and observed waveform using the sparse constraint of primary impulse responses to predict multiples and
remove them directly, instead of using the conventional adaptive subtraction method.
Even though the generalized EPSI method provides a good estimate of the primaries
and multiples when they overlap, it is limited by intensive computational cost.
In this paper, we introduce two strategies to improve computational efficiency.
First, the interface-controlled strategy is introduced by only selecting high-amplitude
primary responses related to the interfaces with strong impedance contrasts to estimate multiples. The computational time is approximately proportional to the number
of involved reflectors and usually, most of the internal multiple energy in the data is
only related to a few strong reflectors. Therefore the modified method can remove
most of the internal multiples in fewer computations than in the generalized EPSI,
which loops through all the interfaces. Next, an approximate formula for estimating primary impulse responses is proposed by neglecting a computationally intensive
term which corresponds to the primary responses estimated from internal multiples.
According to our analyses and experiments, in most cases, the contribution of this term
is negligible because the internal multiples are weak. Therefore, the computational efficiency can be improved without significantly losing quality when estimating most
primaries and multiples.
In order to demonstrate this, multiple elimination of a two-layered simple data and
the Pluto data are implemented. We find that the modified method can yield reliable
results that require fewer computations. The improvements of the modified method
may encourage the use of the generalized EPSI method in industry.
Removing internal multiples remains an important but challenging problem
in seismic processing. The generalized Estimation of Primaries by Sparsity Inversion
(EPSI) method minimizes data residuals between the calculated and observed waveform using the sparse constraint of primary impulse responses to predict multiples and
remove them directly, instead of using the conventional adaptive subtraction method.
Even though the generalized EPSI method provides a good estimate of the primaries
and multiples when they overlap, it is limited by intensive computational cost.
In this paper, we introduce two strategies to improve computational efficiency.
First, the interface-controlled strategy is introduced by only selecting high-amplitude
primary responses related to the interfaces with strong impedance contrasts to estimate multiples. The computational time is approximately proportional to the number
of involved reflectors and usually, most of the internal multiple energy in the data is
only related to a few strong reflectors. Therefore the modified method can remove
most of the internal multiples in fewer computations than in the generalized EPSI,
which loops through all the interfaces. Next, an approximate formula for estimating primary impulse responses is proposed by neglecting a computationally intensive
term which corresponds to the primary responses estimated from internal multiples.
According to our analyses and experiments, in most cases, the contribution of this term
is negligible because the internal multiples are weak. Therefore, the computational efficiency can be improved without significantly losing quality when estimating most
primaries and multiples.
In order to demonstrate this, multiple elimination of a two-layered simple data and
the Pluto data are implemented. We find that the modified method can yield reliable
results that require fewer computations. The improvements of the modified method
may encourage the use of the generalized EPSI method in industry.