- Journal Home
- Volume 36 - 2024
- Volume 35 - 2024
- Volume 34 - 2023
- Volume 33 - 2023
- Volume 32 - 2022
- Volume 31 - 2022
- Volume 30 - 2021
- Volume 29 - 2021
- Volume 28 - 2020
- Volume 27 - 2020
- Volume 26 - 2019
- Volume 25 - 2019
- Volume 24 - 2018
- Volume 23 - 2018
- Volume 22 - 2017
- Volume 21 - 2017
- Volume 20 - 2016
- Volume 19 - 2016
- Volume 18 - 2015
- Volume 17 - 2015
- Volume 16 - 2014
- Volume 15 - 2014
- Volume 14 - 2013
- Volume 13 - 2013
- Volume 12 - 2012
- Volume 11 - 2012
- Volume 10 - 2011
- Volume 9 - 2011
- Volume 8 - 2010
- Volume 7 - 2010
- Volume 6 - 2009
- Volume 5 - 2009
- Volume 4 - 2008
- Volume 3 - 2008
- Volume 2 - 2007
- Volume 1 - 2006
Commun. Comput. Phys., 26 (2019), pp. 1008-1038.
Published online: 2019-07
[An open-access article; the PDF is free to any online user.]
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
Recently, a new family of splitting methods, the so-called vector penalty-projection methods (VPP) were introduced by Angot et al. [4, 7] to compute the solution of unsteady incompressible fluid flows and to overcome most of the drawbacks of the usual incremental projection methods. Two different parameters are related to the VPP methods: the augmentation parameter r ≥0 and the penalty parameter 0<ε≤1. In this paper, we deal with the time-dependent incompressible Stokes equations with open boundary conditions using the VPP methods. The spatial discretization is based on the finite volume scheme on a Marker and Cells (MAC) staggered grid. Furthermore, two different second-order time discretization schemes are investigated: the second-order Backward Difference Formula (BDF2) also known as Gear's scheme and the Crank-Nicolson scheme. We show that the VPP methods provide a second-order convergence rate for both velocity and pressure in space and time even in the presence of open boundary conditions with small values of the augmentation parameter r typically 0≤r≤1 and a penalty parameter ε small enough typically ε=10−10. The resulting constraint on the discrete divergence of velocity is not exactly equal to zero but is satisfied approximately as O(εδt) where ε is the penalty parameter (taken as small as desired) and δt is the time step. The choice r=0 requires special attention to avoid the accumulation of the round-off errors for very small values of ε. Indeed, it is important in this case to directly correct the pressure gradient by taking account of the velocity correction issued from the vector penalty-projection step. Finally, the efficiency and the second-order accuracy of the method are illustrated by several numerical test cases including homogeneous or non-homogeneous given traction on the boundary.
}, issn = {1991-7120}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.OA-2018-0016}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/cicp/13227.html} }Recently, a new family of splitting methods, the so-called vector penalty-projection methods (VPP) were introduced by Angot et al. [4, 7] to compute the solution of unsteady incompressible fluid flows and to overcome most of the drawbacks of the usual incremental projection methods. Two different parameters are related to the VPP methods: the augmentation parameter r ≥0 and the penalty parameter 0<ε≤1. In this paper, we deal with the time-dependent incompressible Stokes equations with open boundary conditions using the VPP methods. The spatial discretization is based on the finite volume scheme on a Marker and Cells (MAC) staggered grid. Furthermore, two different second-order time discretization schemes are investigated: the second-order Backward Difference Formula (BDF2) also known as Gear's scheme and the Crank-Nicolson scheme. We show that the VPP methods provide a second-order convergence rate for both velocity and pressure in space and time even in the presence of open boundary conditions with small values of the augmentation parameter r typically 0≤r≤1 and a penalty parameter ε small enough typically ε=10−10. The resulting constraint on the discrete divergence of velocity is not exactly equal to zero but is satisfied approximately as O(εδt) where ε is the penalty parameter (taken as small as desired) and δt is the time step. The choice r=0 requires special attention to avoid the accumulation of the round-off errors for very small values of ε. Indeed, it is important in this case to directly correct the pressure gradient by taking account of the velocity correction issued from the vector penalty-projection step. Finally, the efficiency and the second-order accuracy of the method are illustrated by several numerical test cases including homogeneous or non-homogeneous given traction on the boundary.