arrow
Volume 17, Issue 2
Comparison of Sharp and Diffuse Interface Methods for Radially Symmetric Compressible Multi-Medium Fluid Flows

Xiaotao Zhang, Tiegang Liu, Fan Zhang, Zhiqiang Zeng & Chengliang Feng

Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 17 (2025), pp. 407-439.

Published online: 2024-12

Export citation
  • Abstract

The effects of non-physical mixing on interface development are still not reasonably evaluated when diffuse interface methods (DIMs) are employed to treat the two-medium flows with immiscible interfaces, especially for compressible multi-medium flows with geometrical source terms. In this work, we simulate radially symmetric multi-medium flows employing the sharp interface methods (SIMs) and DIMs to evaluate their performance such as pressure dislocations, mass conservation, and convergence. The $\gamma$-based model and the five-equation transport model are two common DIMs, which are extended to equations with geometrical source terms combined with discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods. For the SIMs, we employ the classical modified ghost fluid method (MGFM) and its second-order extension (2nd-MGFM) developed recently. Numerical results exhibit that the 2nd-MGFM is more effective in maintaining the interfacial pressure equilibrium relative to the MGFM. The DIMs can always maintain the pressure continuity naturally and total mass conservation, which is not available for SIMs. Further, under the premise of immiscible interfaces defined artificially, the DIMs cannot provide satisfactory single medium mass conservation, while the SIMs have a smaller mass error. In addition, compared to the other three methods, the 2nd-MGFM has higher confidence for radially symmetric flows, matching the exact solution in sparser grids.

  • AMS Subject Headings

65M22, 65M60

  • Copyright

COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

  • Email address
  • BibTex
  • RIS
  • TXT
@Article{AAMM-17-407, author = {Zhang , XiaotaoLiu , TiegangZhang , FanZeng , Zhiqiang and Feng , Chengliang}, title = {Comparison of Sharp and Diffuse Interface Methods for Radially Symmetric Compressible Multi-Medium Fluid Flows}, journal = {Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics}, year = {2024}, volume = {17}, number = {2}, pages = {407--439}, abstract = {

The effects of non-physical mixing on interface development are still not reasonably evaluated when diffuse interface methods (DIMs) are employed to treat the two-medium flows with immiscible interfaces, especially for compressible multi-medium flows with geometrical source terms. In this work, we simulate radially symmetric multi-medium flows employing the sharp interface methods (SIMs) and DIMs to evaluate their performance such as pressure dislocations, mass conservation, and convergence. The $\gamma$-based model and the five-equation transport model are two common DIMs, which are extended to equations with geometrical source terms combined with discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods. For the SIMs, we employ the classical modified ghost fluid method (MGFM) and its second-order extension (2nd-MGFM) developed recently. Numerical results exhibit that the 2nd-MGFM is more effective in maintaining the interfacial pressure equilibrium relative to the MGFM. The DIMs can always maintain the pressure continuity naturally and total mass conservation, which is not available for SIMs. Further, under the premise of immiscible interfaces defined artificially, the DIMs cannot provide satisfactory single medium mass conservation, while the SIMs have a smaller mass error. In addition, compared to the other three methods, the 2nd-MGFM has higher confidence for radially symmetric flows, matching the exact solution in sparser grids.

}, issn = {2075-1354}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/aamm.OA-2023-0227}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/aamm/23728.html} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of Sharp and Diffuse Interface Methods for Radially Symmetric Compressible Multi-Medium Fluid Flows AU - Zhang , Xiaotao AU - Liu , Tiegang AU - Zhang , Fan AU - Zeng , Zhiqiang AU - Feng , Chengliang JO - Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics VL - 2 SP - 407 EP - 439 PY - 2024 DA - 2024/12 SN - 17 DO - http://doi.org/10.4208/aamm.OA-2023-0227 UR - https://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/aamm/23728.html KW - Multi-medium compressible flow, sharp interface methods, diffuse interface methods, modified ghost fluid method, $\gamma$-based model, five-equation transport model. AB -

The effects of non-physical mixing on interface development are still not reasonably evaluated when diffuse interface methods (DIMs) are employed to treat the two-medium flows with immiscible interfaces, especially for compressible multi-medium flows with geometrical source terms. In this work, we simulate radially symmetric multi-medium flows employing the sharp interface methods (SIMs) and DIMs to evaluate their performance such as pressure dislocations, mass conservation, and convergence. The $\gamma$-based model and the five-equation transport model are two common DIMs, which are extended to equations with geometrical source terms combined with discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods. For the SIMs, we employ the classical modified ghost fluid method (MGFM) and its second-order extension (2nd-MGFM) developed recently. Numerical results exhibit that the 2nd-MGFM is more effective in maintaining the interfacial pressure equilibrium relative to the MGFM. The DIMs can always maintain the pressure continuity naturally and total mass conservation, which is not available for SIMs. Further, under the premise of immiscible interfaces defined artificially, the DIMs cannot provide satisfactory single medium mass conservation, while the SIMs have a smaller mass error. In addition, compared to the other three methods, the 2nd-MGFM has higher confidence for radially symmetric flows, matching the exact solution in sparser grids.

Zhang , XiaotaoLiu , TiegangZhang , FanZeng , Zhiqiang and Feng , Chengliang. (2024). Comparison of Sharp and Diffuse Interface Methods for Radially Symmetric Compressible Multi-Medium Fluid Flows. Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. 17 (2). 407-439. doi:10.4208/aamm.OA-2023-0227
Copy to clipboard
The citation has been copied to your clipboard