- Journal Home
- Volume 43 - 2025
- Volume 42 - 2024
- Volume 41 - 2023
- Volume 40 - 2022
- Volume 39 - 2021
- Volume 38 - 2020
- Volume 37 - 2019
- Volume 36 - 2018
- Volume 35 - 2017
- Volume 34 - 2016
- Volume 33 - 2015
- Volume 32 - 2014
- Volume 31 - 2013
- Volume 30 - 2012
- Volume 29 - 2011
- Volume 28 - 2010
- Volume 27 - 2009
- Volume 26 - 2008
- Volume 25 - 2007
- Volume 24 - 2006
- Volume 23 - 2005
- Volume 22 - 2004
- Volume 21 - 2003
- Volume 20 - 2002
- Volume 19 - 2001
- Volume 18 - 2000
- Volume 17 - 1999
- Volume 16 - 1998
- Volume 15 - 1997
- Volume 14 - 1996
- Volume 13 - 1995
- Volume 12 - 1994
- Volume 11 - 1993
- Volume 10 - 1992
- Volume 9 - 1991
- Volume 8 - 1990
- Volume 7 - 1989
- Volume 6 - 1988
- Volume 5 - 1987
- Volume 4 - 1986
- Volume 3 - 1985
- Volume 2 - 1984
- Volume 1 - 1983
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
Predictor-corrector algorithm for linear programming, proposed by Mizuno et al.$^{[1]}$, becomes the best well known in the interior point methods. The purpose of this paper is to extend these results in two directions. First, we modify the algorithm in order to solve convex quadratic programming with upper bounds. Second, we replace the corrector step with an iteration of Monteiro and Adler's algorithm$^{[2]}$. With these modifications, the duality gap is reduced by a constant factor after each corrector step for convex quadratic programming. It is shown that the new algorithm has a $O(\sqrt nL)$-iteration complexity.
}, issn = {1991-7139}, doi = {https://doi.org/}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/jcm/9259.html} }Predictor-corrector algorithm for linear programming, proposed by Mizuno et al.$^{[1]}$, becomes the best well known in the interior point methods. The purpose of this paper is to extend these results in two directions. First, we modify the algorithm in order to solve convex quadratic programming with upper bounds. Second, we replace the corrector step with an iteration of Monteiro and Adler's algorithm$^{[2]}$. With these modifications, the duality gap is reduced by a constant factor after each corrector step for convex quadratic programming. It is shown that the new algorithm has a $O(\sqrt nL)$-iteration complexity.