- Journal Home
- Volume 43 - 2025
- Volume 42 - 2024
- Volume 41 - 2023
- Volume 40 - 2022
- Volume 39 - 2021
- Volume 38 - 2020
- Volume 37 - 2019
- Volume 36 - 2018
- Volume 35 - 2017
- Volume 34 - 2016
- Volume 33 - 2015
- Volume 32 - 2014
- Volume 31 - 2013
- Volume 30 - 2012
- Volume 29 - 2011
- Volume 28 - 2010
- Volume 27 - 2009
- Volume 26 - 2008
- Volume 25 - 2007
- Volume 24 - 2006
- Volume 23 - 2005
- Volume 22 - 2004
- Volume 21 - 2003
- Volume 20 - 2002
- Volume 19 - 2001
- Volume 18 - 2000
- Volume 17 - 1999
- Volume 16 - 1998
- Volume 15 - 1997
- Volume 14 - 1996
- Volume 13 - 1995
- Volume 12 - 1994
- Volume 11 - 1993
- Volume 10 - 1992
- Volume 9 - 1991
- Volume 8 - 1990
- Volume 7 - 1989
- Volume 6 - 1988
- Volume 5 - 1987
- Volume 4 - 1986
- Volume 3 - 1985
- Volume 2 - 1984
- Volume 1 - 1983
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
In the paper, we analyze the $L^2$ norm error estimate of lower order finite element methods for the fourth order problem. We prove that the best error estimate in the $L^2$ norm of the finite element solution is of second order, which can not be improved generally. The main ingredients are the saturation condition established for these elements and an identity for the error in the energy norm of the finite element solution. The result holds for most of the popular lower order finite element methods in the literature including: the Powell-Sabin $C^1-P_2$ macro element, the nonconforming Morley element, the $C^1-Q_2$ macro element, the nonconforming rectangle Morley element, and the nonconforming incomplete biquadratic element. In addition, the result actually applies to the nonconforming Adini element, the nonconforming Fraeijs de Veubeke elements, and the nonconforming Wang-Xu element and the Wang-Shi-Xu element provided that the saturation condition holds for them. This result solves one long standing problem in the literature: can the $L^2$ norm error estimate of lower order finite element methods of the fourth order problem be two order higher than the error estimate in the energy norm?
}, issn = {1991-7139}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/jcm.1203-m3855}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/jcm/8443.html} }In the paper, we analyze the $L^2$ norm error estimate of lower order finite element methods for the fourth order problem. We prove that the best error estimate in the $L^2$ norm of the finite element solution is of second order, which can not be improved generally. The main ingredients are the saturation condition established for these elements and an identity for the error in the energy norm of the finite element solution. The result holds for most of the popular lower order finite element methods in the literature including: the Powell-Sabin $C^1-P_2$ macro element, the nonconforming Morley element, the $C^1-Q_2$ macro element, the nonconforming rectangle Morley element, and the nonconforming incomplete biquadratic element. In addition, the result actually applies to the nonconforming Adini element, the nonconforming Fraeijs de Veubeke elements, and the nonconforming Wang-Xu element and the Wang-Shi-Xu element provided that the saturation condition holds for them. This result solves one long standing problem in the literature: can the $L^2$ norm error estimate of lower order finite element methods of the fourth order problem be two order higher than the error estimate in the energy norm?