Comparison Results Between Preconditioned Jacobi and the AOR Iterative Method
Numer. Math. J. Chinese Univ. (English Ser.)(English Ser.) 16 (2007), pp. 313-319
Published online: 2007-11
Cited by
Export citation
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
@Article{NM-16-313,
author = { W. Li and J. C. Li},
title = {Comparison Results Between Preconditioned Jacobi and the AOR Iterative Method},
journal = {Numerical Mathematics, a Journal of Chinese Universities},
year = {2007},
volume = {16},
number = {4},
pages = {313--319},
abstract = {
The large scale linear systems with $M$-matrices often appear in a
wide variety of areas of physical, fluid dynamics and economic
sciences. It is reported in [1] that the convergence rate of the
IMGS method, with the preconditioner $I+S_{\alpha}$, is superior to
that of the basic SOR iterative method for the $M$-matrix. This
paper considers the preconditioned Jacobi (PJ) method with the
preconditioner $P=I+S_{\alpha}+S_{\beta}$, and proves theoretically
that the convergence rate of the PJ method is better than that of
the basic AOR method. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate
the main results obtained.},
issn = {},
doi = {https://doi.org/},
url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/nm/8059.html}
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison Results Between Preconditioned Jacobi and the AOR Iterative Method
AU - W. Li & J. C. Li
JO - Numerical Mathematics, a Journal of Chinese Universities
VL - 4
SP - 313
EP - 319
PY - 2007
DA - 2007/11
SN - 16
DO - http://doi.org/
UR - https://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/nm/8059.html
KW -
AB -
The large scale linear systems with $M$-matrices often appear in a
wide variety of areas of physical, fluid dynamics and economic
sciences. It is reported in [1] that the convergence rate of the
IMGS method, with the preconditioner $I+S_{\alpha}$, is superior to
that of the basic SOR iterative method for the $M$-matrix. This
paper considers the preconditioned Jacobi (PJ) method with the
preconditioner $P=I+S_{\alpha}+S_{\beta}$, and proves theoretically
that the convergence rate of the PJ method is better than that of
the basic AOR method. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate
the main results obtained.
W. Li and J. C. Li. (2007). Comparison Results Between Preconditioned Jacobi and the AOR Iterative Method.
Numerical Mathematics, a Journal of Chinese Universities. 16 (4).
313-319.
doi:
Copy to clipboard