- Journal Home
- Volume 22 - 2025
- Volume 21 - 2024
- Volume 20 - 2023
- Volume 19 - 2022
- Volume 18 - 2021
- Volume 17 - 2020
- Volume 16 - 2019
- Volume 15 - 2018
- Volume 14 - 2017
- Volume 13 - 2016
- Volume 12 - 2015
- Volume 11 - 2014
- Volume 10 - 2013
- Volume 9 - 2012
- Volume 8 - 2011
- Volume 7 - 2010
- Volume 6 - 2009
- Volume 5 - 2008
- Volume 4 - 2007
- Volume 3 - 2006
- Volume 2 - 2005
- Volume 1 - 2004
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
We study the numerical errors in finite elements
discretizations of a time relaxation model of fluid motion:
$u_t + u\cdot \nabla u + \nabla p - \nu\Delta u + \chi u^* = f$ and $\nabla \cdot u = 0$
In this model, introduced by Stolz, Adams, and Kleiser, $u^*$ is a
generalized fluctuation and $\chi$ the time relaxation parameter. The goal
of inclusion of the $\chi u^*$ is to drive unresolved fluctuations to zero
exponentially. We study convergence of discretization of model to the
model's solution as $h$, $\Delta t \rightarrow 0$. Next we complement this with an
experimental study of the effect the time relaxation term (and a
nonlinear extension of it) has on the large scales of a flow near a
transitional point. We close by showing that the time relaxation term
does not alter shock speeds in the inviscid, compressible case, giving
analytical confirmation of a result of Stolz, Adams, and Kleiser.
We study the numerical errors in finite elements
discretizations of a time relaxation model of fluid motion:
$u_t + u\cdot \nabla u + \nabla p - \nu\Delta u + \chi u^* = f$ and $\nabla \cdot u = 0$
In this model, introduced by Stolz, Adams, and Kleiser, $u^*$ is a
generalized fluctuation and $\chi$ the time relaxation parameter. The goal
of inclusion of the $\chi u^*$ is to drive unresolved fluctuations to zero
exponentially. We study convergence of discretization of model to the
model's solution as $h$, $\Delta t \rightarrow 0$. Next we complement this with an
experimental study of the effect the time relaxation term (and a
nonlinear extension of it) has on the large scales of a flow near a
transitional point. We close by showing that the time relaxation term
does not alter shock speeds in the inviscid, compressible case, giving
analytical confirmation of a result of Stolz, Adams, and Kleiser.