- Journal Home
- Volume 22 - 2025
- Volume 21 - 2024
- Volume 20 - 2023
- Volume 19 - 2022
- Volume 18 - 2021
- Volume 17 - 2020
- Volume 16 - 2019
- Volume 15 - 2018
- Volume 14 - 2017
- Volume 13 - 2016
- Volume 12 - 2015
- Volume 11 - 2014
- Volume 10 - 2013
- Volume 9 - 2012
- Volume 8 - 2011
- Volume 7 - 2010
- Volume 6 - 2009
- Volume 5 - 2008
- Volume 4 - 2007
- Volume 3 - 2006
- Volume 2 - 2005
- Volume 1 - 2004
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
We present an analysis of an Alternating Direction Implicit (ADI) scheme for a linear, singularly perturbed reaction-diffusion equation. By providing an expression for the error that separates the temporal and spatial components, we can use existing results for steady-state problems to give a succinct analysis for the time-dependent problem, and that generalizes for various layer-adapted meshes. We report the results of numerical experiments that support the theoretical findings. In addition, we provide a numerical comparison between the ADI and Euler techniques, as well details of the computational advantage gained by parallelizing the algorithm.
}, issn = {2617-8710}, doi = {https://doi.org/}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/ijnam/734.html} }We present an analysis of an Alternating Direction Implicit (ADI) scheme for a linear, singularly perturbed reaction-diffusion equation. By providing an expression for the error that separates the temporal and spatial components, we can use existing results for steady-state problems to give a succinct analysis for the time-dependent problem, and that generalizes for various layer-adapted meshes. We report the results of numerical experiments that support the theoretical findings. In addition, we provide a numerical comparison between the ADI and Euler techniques, as well details of the computational advantage gained by parallelizing the algorithm.