arrow
Volume 8, Issue 3
A Penalty Function Method for Constrained Molecular Dynamics Simulation

A. Gunaratne & Z. Wu

Int. J. Numer. Anal. Mod., 8 (2011), pp. 496-517.

Published online: 2011-08

Export citation
  • Abstract

We propose a penalty-function method for constrained molecular dynamics simulation by defining a quadratic penalty function for the constraints. The simulation with such a method can be done by using a conventional, unconstrained solver only with the penalty parameter increased in an appropriate manner as the simulation proceeds. More specifically, we scale the constraints with their force constants when forming the penalty terms. The resulting force function can then be viewed as a smooth continuation of the original force field as the penalty parameter increases. The penalty function method is easy to implement and costs less than a Lagrange multiplier method, which requires the solution of a nonlinear system of equations in every time step. We have first implemented a penalty function method in CHARMM and applied it to protein Bovine Pancreatic Trypsin Inhibitor (BPTI). We compared the simulation results with Verlet and Shake, and found that the penalty function method had high correlations with Shake and outperformed Verlet. In particular, the RMSD fluctuations of backbone and non-backbone atoms and the velocity auto correlations of $C_{\alpha}$ atoms of the protein calculated by the penalty function method agreed well with those by Shake. We have also tested the method on a group of argon clusters constrained with a set of interatomic distances in their global energy minimum states. The results showed that the method was able to impose the constraints effectively and the clusters tended to converge to their energy minima more rapidly than not confined by the constraints.

  • AMS Subject Headings

35R35, 49J40, 60G40

  • Copyright

COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

  • Email address
  • BibTex
  • RIS
  • TXT
@Article{IJNAM-8-496, author = {Gunaratne , A. and Wu , Z.}, title = {A Penalty Function Method for Constrained Molecular Dynamics Simulation}, journal = {International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling}, year = {2011}, volume = {8}, number = {3}, pages = {496--517}, abstract = {

We propose a penalty-function method for constrained molecular dynamics simulation by defining a quadratic penalty function for the constraints. The simulation with such a method can be done by using a conventional, unconstrained solver only with the penalty parameter increased in an appropriate manner as the simulation proceeds. More specifically, we scale the constraints with their force constants when forming the penalty terms. The resulting force function can then be viewed as a smooth continuation of the original force field as the penalty parameter increases. The penalty function method is easy to implement and costs less than a Lagrange multiplier method, which requires the solution of a nonlinear system of equations in every time step. We have first implemented a penalty function method in CHARMM and applied it to protein Bovine Pancreatic Trypsin Inhibitor (BPTI). We compared the simulation results with Verlet and Shake, and found that the penalty function method had high correlations with Shake and outperformed Verlet. In particular, the RMSD fluctuations of backbone and non-backbone atoms and the velocity auto correlations of $C_{\alpha}$ atoms of the protein calculated by the penalty function method agreed well with those by Shake. We have also tested the method on a group of argon clusters constrained with a set of interatomic distances in their global energy minimum states. The results showed that the method was able to impose the constraints effectively and the clusters tended to converge to their energy minima more rapidly than not confined by the constraints.

}, issn = {2617-8710}, doi = {https://doi.org/}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/ijnam/698.html} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A Penalty Function Method for Constrained Molecular Dynamics Simulation AU - Gunaratne , A. AU - Wu , Z. JO - International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling VL - 3 SP - 496 EP - 517 PY - 2011 DA - 2011/08 SN - 8 DO - http://doi.org/ UR - https://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/ijnam/698.html KW - Constrained molecular dynamics, Verlet algorithm, Shake algorithm, Lagrange multipliers method, penalty function method. AB -

We propose a penalty-function method for constrained molecular dynamics simulation by defining a quadratic penalty function for the constraints. The simulation with such a method can be done by using a conventional, unconstrained solver only with the penalty parameter increased in an appropriate manner as the simulation proceeds. More specifically, we scale the constraints with their force constants when forming the penalty terms. The resulting force function can then be viewed as a smooth continuation of the original force field as the penalty parameter increases. The penalty function method is easy to implement and costs less than a Lagrange multiplier method, which requires the solution of a nonlinear system of equations in every time step. We have first implemented a penalty function method in CHARMM and applied it to protein Bovine Pancreatic Trypsin Inhibitor (BPTI). We compared the simulation results with Verlet and Shake, and found that the penalty function method had high correlations with Shake and outperformed Verlet. In particular, the RMSD fluctuations of backbone and non-backbone atoms and the velocity auto correlations of $C_{\alpha}$ atoms of the protein calculated by the penalty function method agreed well with those by Shake. We have also tested the method on a group of argon clusters constrained with a set of interatomic distances in their global energy minimum states. The results showed that the method was able to impose the constraints effectively and the clusters tended to converge to their energy minima more rapidly than not confined by the constraints.

A. Gunaratne & Z. Wu. (1970). A Penalty Function Method for Constrained Molecular Dynamics Simulation. International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling. 8 (3). 496-517. doi:
Copy to clipboard
The citation has been copied to your clipboard