- Journal Home
- Volume 22 - 2025
- Volume 21 - 2024
- Volume 20 - 2023
- Volume 19 - 2022
- Volume 18 - 2021
- Volume 17 - 2020
- Volume 16 - 2019
- Volume 15 - 2018
- Volume 14 - 2017
- Volume 13 - 2016
- Volume 12 - 2015
- Volume 11 - 2014
- Volume 10 - 2013
- Volume 9 - 2012
- Volume 8 - 2011
- Volume 7 - 2010
- Volume 6 - 2009
- Volume 5 - 2008
- Volume 4 - 2007
- Volume 3 - 2006
- Volume 2 - 2005
- Volume 1 - 2004
Int. J. Numer. Anal. Mod., 21 (2024), pp. 407-430.
Published online: 2024-05
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
In this paper, we consider 3D steady convection-diffusion equations in cylindrical domains. Instead of applying the finite difference methods (FDM) or the finite element methods (FEM), we propose a difference finite element method (DFEM) that can maximize good applicability and efficiency of both FDM and FEM. The essence of this method lies in employing the centered difference discretization in the $z$-direction and the finite element discretization based on the $P_1$ conforming elements in the $(x, y)$ plane. This allows us to solve partial differential equations on complex cylindrical domains at lower computational costs compared to applying the 3D finite element method. We derive stability estimates for the difference finite element solution and establish the explicit dependence of $H_1$ error bounds on the diffusivity, convection field modulus, and mesh size. Finally, we provide numerical examples to verify the theoretical predictions and showcase the accuracy of the considered method.
}, issn = {2617-8710}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/ijnam2024-1016}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/ijnam/23129.html} }In this paper, we consider 3D steady convection-diffusion equations in cylindrical domains. Instead of applying the finite difference methods (FDM) or the finite element methods (FEM), we propose a difference finite element method (DFEM) that can maximize good applicability and efficiency of both FDM and FEM. The essence of this method lies in employing the centered difference discretization in the $z$-direction and the finite element discretization based on the $P_1$ conforming elements in the $(x, y)$ plane. This allows us to solve partial differential equations on complex cylindrical domains at lower computational costs compared to applying the 3D finite element method. We derive stability estimates for the difference finite element solution and establish the explicit dependence of $H_1$ error bounds on the diffusivity, convection field modulus, and mesh size. Finally, we provide numerical examples to verify the theoretical predictions and showcase the accuracy of the considered method.