- Journal Home
- Volume 22 - 2025
- Volume 21 - 2024
- Volume 20 - 2023
- Volume 19 - 2022
- Volume 18 - 2021
- Volume 17 - 2020
- Volume 16 - 2019
- Volume 15 - 2018
- Volume 14 - 2017
- Volume 13 - 2016
- Volume 12 - 2015
- Volume 11 - 2014
- Volume 10 - 2013
- Volume 9 - 2012
- Volume 8 - 2011
- Volume 7 - 2010
- Volume 6 - 2009
- Volume 5 - 2008
- Volume 4 - 2007
- Volume 3 - 2006
- Volume 2 - 2005
- Volume 1 - 2004
Int. J. Numer. Anal. Mod., 20 (2023), pp. 407-436.
Published online: 2023-03
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
We develop, analyze and test adaptive penalty parameter methods. We prove unconditional stability for velocity when adapting the penalty parameter, $ϵ,$ and stability of the velocity time derivative under a condition on the change of the penalty parameter, $ϵ(t_{n+1}) − ϵ(t_n).$ The analysis and tests show that adapting $ϵ(t_{n+1})$ in response to $∇·u(t_n)$ removes the problem of picking $ϵ$ and yields good approximations for the velocity. We provide error analysis and numerical tests to support these results. We supplement the adaptive-$ϵ$ method by also adapting the time-step. The penalty parameter ϵ and time-step are adapted independently. We further compare first, second and variable order time-step algorithms. Accurate recovery of pressure remains an open problem.
}, issn = {2617-8710}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/ijnam2023-1017}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/ijnam/21540.html} }We develop, analyze and test adaptive penalty parameter methods. We prove unconditional stability for velocity when adapting the penalty parameter, $ϵ,$ and stability of the velocity time derivative under a condition on the change of the penalty parameter, $ϵ(t_{n+1}) − ϵ(t_n).$ The analysis and tests show that adapting $ϵ(t_{n+1})$ in response to $∇·u(t_n)$ removes the problem of picking $ϵ$ and yields good approximations for the velocity. We provide error analysis and numerical tests to support these results. We supplement the adaptive-$ϵ$ method by also adapting the time-step. The penalty parameter ϵ and time-step are adapted independently. We further compare first, second and variable order time-step algorithms. Accurate recovery of pressure remains an open problem.